🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump previously went for the progressive now. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it because then none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there was some opposition. However overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.