🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage may be the perfect selection for a bold scary movie centered on Jesus Christ, but not for the causes some fans may think. Actually, Cage does not actually play Jesus in the new film: his character is referred to merely as The Carpenter. He is framed as a father figure within this tale, working to keep his beliefs as The Boy (portrayed by the young actor), his now-teenage foster child, starts to exhibit supernatural abilities. The reason it's hard to envision a different prominent performer in this role is that even as the figure becomes burdened with numerous difficulties, the actor seems almost emotionally convinced that this murky, bleak feature is deserving of his effort.

Cage's Latest Projects

Cage has spending his time more judiciously lately. He still does additional projects than most regular audiences may ever watch — for example, were you informed that the man has made several different frontier films over the last few years? — however he also mixes in esteemed independent films for example one recent hit, Pig, and Longlegs. The Carpenter’s Son appears to be a similar project, in that it’s not strictly scary, likely to stir debate, and handles a campy-sounding concept with gravity.

Movie's Plot and Direction

Sadly, writer-director the director fails to repay viewer engagement. The Carpenter’s Son opens in a engagingly rootless setting, marketed as drawing from an obscure religious text regarding the early years of Jesus. The Carpenter, the maternal figure, and their child travel from place to place, afraid of doctrinal intolerance or distrust regarding their son's strange powers. “Trouble pursues us,” Cage gloomily remarks. That continues when sinister entities target them where they currently live, getting a jump-start on that familiar Biblical temptation for the youth.

At times, the film resembles an demonic possession-type possession movie, but none of the main figures are clearly inhabited. Instead, they are increasingly alienated from one another, as these entities influence a local young woman (the actress, credited as “The Stranger”) who The Boy bonds with, and provides all unsettling premonitions of a dark tomorrow. The Carpenter notably fights with his role within the plot, sometimes chastising his child he can’t fully understand.

Controversy and Sensitivity

The subject matter is prone to court controversy, and the director approaches it with plenty of delicacy — overly, possibly. The notion of a young man confronted with his eventual sacrifice and seduced by mysterious forces is truly terrifying, but Nathan could be cautious about seeming gratuitous and keen to indicate his goals, thus he frequently retreats into darkly ominous filming. The roles constantly ponder — FKA Twigs, who displayed real promise in a recent film update, surprisingly — surrenders her role to her religious attire, sometimes broken up by several gnarly horror imagery.

Cage's Portrayal and Film's Weaknesses

Meanwhile, the actor dabbles in exactly the kind of exaggerated performance that his ironic fans might be looking for. There is a moment (featured) in promotional material in which Cage loses control and shouts “My belief is broken!” When this sort of florid outburst is part of a religious scary film, maybe a more brazenly silly method would take better advantage of Cage’s willingness to exaggerate when necessary. Rather, The Carpenter’s Son echoes the weaker low-budget movies the actor filmed during the last decade — apart from the B-movies but rather the narrative films and paranormal movies that often seem intriguing, and often contain a few choice memorable scenes, but finally come across like, well, cheap home video fare.

Frankly, some of those, although simpler, were more watchable in general. At this point I must break my own dogma, not faith-based but professional: Previously, an admired senior convinced me to banish adjectives like “tedious” or “uninteresting” from my film-criticism vocabulary. These phrases communicate minimal but a personal and vaguely expressed restlessness, withdrawing from the job of vividly conveying the thoughtful and sensation of watching a specific film. It's challenging to express boredom without seeming uninteresting personally. It’s no more expressive as calling a movie “interesting.” “Explain further,” essentially.

Yet, I acknowledge, I grew weary during much of the film. In its defense, it is a religious style of boredom, not for this movie is lecturing, but as it takes a sort of dutiful submission to view it. At some point soon after starting, the movie settles into a monotonous pattern of ongoing suffering, and does not