🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on recent research, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now the government is shut down because political disagreements over tax credits that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. How medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning moderate income must contribute about 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I can name multiple clients that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When including these expenses versus what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to many our government's defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding about benefits by our employees – as opposed to the current system which require them to interpret the complications of current options. And there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.