🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to address white audiences about hidden biases and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since its inception, focusing less on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a instructive case in how co-option leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A campaign to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the month symbolises how little it can be influential if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its short period means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a prof at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to minor insults, but confronted with the threats that impact society if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.